Archives

Oct 2008 (3 Entries)
Sep 2008 (4 Entries)
Aug 2008 (2 Entries)
Jul 2008 (3 Entries)
Jun 2008 (3 Entries)
May 2008 (6 Entries)
Apr 2008 (3 Entries)
Mar 2008 (4 Entries)
Feb 2008 (3 Entries)
Jan 2008 (10 Entries)
Dec 2007 (7 Entries)
Nov 2007 (8 Entries)
Oct 2007 (17 Entries)
Sep 2007 (14 Entries)
Aug 2007 (19 Entries)
Jul 2007 (20 Entries)
Jun 2007 (13 Entries)
May 2007 (14 Entries)
Apr 2007 (17 Entries)
Mar 2007 (34 Entries)
Feb 2007 (13 Entries)
Jan 2007 (3 Entries)

Tags

Subscribe to the RSS feed for 'Yummr's Main Dish' Subscribe to RSS

Yummr's Main Dish

The Ethics and Impact of Blogging

Recently there has been a flurry of conversation surrounding the role of Bloggers in the culinary world. Does the casual or 'professional' Foodie Blogger have a responsibility to chefs and their menus when their comments waiver on the line of totally subjective leading to an actual shift in the public perception and ultimately the fate of a restaurant or career of a chef? What is the ethical responsibility of a Blogger? This is the ultimate question, it seems.

As Bloggers, we all clearly have a right to write. This is why we are here. However, are all Bloggers, especially the influential ones, writing and forming their opinions from an objective and educated place? Do all Bloggers do their homework before blasting out on the Internet their 'informed' opinions about a menu, a chef, the ambiance of a restaurante, the depth of a wine list? Is it their obligation to? Or is an opinion just an opinion?

How influential is the Foodie Blogger who just sets out to go to restaurants that he/she would experience just because they love food and then write about it? Can a slew of negative experiences of these Bloggers really effect a restaurant? If he/she gets the facts wrong, is there a level of accountability?  

Everyone from the big man who can do no wrong in the eyes of most behind the kitchen, Mario Batali to the Amateur Gourment, Adam Roberts, have weighed in on this subject. 

From Batali:

"My broader point is that the casual and serious reader alike cannot possibly hold the anonymous blogosphere accountable. I think, in fact, many of the readers know this and enjoy the fun. But the blog is now a new partner, and this bit of shoddy journalism will be picked up and promulgated by the rest of the gray zone and march its merry way toward the center of the road. Eventually these blog posts become factual information lost in the sauce.

But, in the end, I do not hate the blogger. I just expect, and want, more from many of them."

From Roberts:

"I'd like to think that food bloggers like me, who write about food and cooking and the occasional meal out, are allies of good, honest, hard-working chefs who have quality food to share and, perhaps, very few outlets in which to promote that food."

What do you think?

Posted Jul 2, 2007 by sarahisafoodie | 1 Comment |
Filed under: Foodie Blogger Mario Batali Ed Levine Amateur Gourmet

Comments:

Response

By MappyB image MappyB on July 2, 2007 at 02:19:25 PM

"Do all Bloggers do their homework before blasting out on the Internet their 'informed' opinions about a menu, a chef, the ambiance of a restaurante, the depth of a wine list? Is it their obligation to? Or is an opinion just an opinion?"

 

In my case, whenever I write about food, it's totally my opinion. I have no pretensions of being a chef, knowing foodie terms or correct wine pairings. I just like what I like, and dislike what I dislike. I think readers that take everything they read on foodie blogs (and I suppose other genres) as fact is very sad. I know people that will not eat somewhere based on a poor review, and people that will dish out their last dollar to try the best new raved about place.

Most of my personal writing is asking for information from the readers, or declaring my ignorance about certain items...

Add a comment


You must login or register to comment

Yummy Topics